Post-demo decision path

Turn a good demo into the right first proposal.

After a broker understands the public Rising Hills site and private Lead Hub, the next move is not more explanation. It is choosing the first launch track, collecting the right inputs, and turning the conversation into a scoped proposal.

Proposal tracks

Choose the offer that matches the client's first proof point.

Track 1 $12k-$18k initial build

Community Launch

A brokerage that wants to prove AIRES with one community, neighborhood, listing campaign, or model-home workflow.

  • One branded public launch site
  • Curated featured listings and portal handoffs
  • Request-demo or registration capture
  • Lead Hub inbox and broker dashboard
  • Basic routing, CSV/export, and launch checklist
Core Operations support

Collect one community story, listing links, roster, routing owner, and day-one CRM/export path.

Track 2 $18k-$35k initial build

Brokerage Growth

A team that wants the first launch plus agent pages, agent portal rollout, Smart Lists, stronger reporting, and repeatable routing.

  • Everything in Community Launch
  • Agent profiles and agent-scoped Hub views
  • Smart Lists and follow-up queues
  • Registration/event workflow
  • Saved export presets and CRM handoff planning
Scale & Agent Growth support

Collect roster details, profile assets, lead ownership rules, registration use cases, and reporting expectations.

Track 3 $35k+ scoped rollout

Multi-Community OS

A brokerage that wants AIRES to become the reusable operating layer across multiple communities, teams, events, and CRM workflows.

  • Multi-community launch structure
  • Client modules, feature flags, and launch checklist controls
  • Advanced routing and team permissions
  • CRM/webhook/API integration planning
  • Phased rollout roadmap and support cadence
Custom Enterprise or Scale support

Define the first phase, client/account structure, module boundaries, CRM credential path, and rollout governance.

Decision inputs

Six answers make the proposal concrete.

First launch focus

Which one community, listing campaign, agent team, registration event, or brokerage workflow should prove the system first?

Decision owner

Who can approve the build package, support tier, timeline, public-site content, Hub access, and CRM/export path?

Success metric

What should the first launch prove: more captured inquiries, faster routing, cleaner follow-up, better event registration, or broker accountability?

Day-one handoff

Should launch start with broker dashboard, CSV export, saved preset, CRM handoff job, webhook/API planning, or weekly report?

Agent scope

Is this a broker-only workflow first, or should agents receive their own profiles, portals, queues, and listing tools on day one?

Support model

Does the client need Core Operations support, Scale & Agent Growth support, or a larger custom rollout cadence?

Close sequence

Move from interest to a scoped next step.

1

Choose a track

Pick Community Launch, Brokerage Growth, or Multi-Community OS based on the first proof point.

2

Collect launch inputs

Use the launch-intake form and First Launch Plan to gather brand, roster, listing, routing, CRM, and support details.

3

Build the proposal

Use the Proposal Builder preset that matches the selected track, then adjust price range, modules, timeline, and assumptions.

4

Confirm next meeting

Schedule a scope review with the decision owner and define what is needed to approve the first milestone.

Approval packet

Leave the call with decisions, owners, and proof.

This is the bridge between a strong demo and a sendable proposal. Each item should have an owner, a decision, and a proof point before the final package goes out.

AIRES + decision owner

Launch package

Decision: Community Launch, Brokerage Growth, or Multi-Community OS.

Proof: Match the package to the smallest public site plus Hub workflow that proves value.

Brokerage sponsor

Support tier

Decision: Core Operations, Scale & Agent Growth, or custom enterprise support.

Proof: Confirm monthly hosting, maintenance, updates, and response expectations before proposal send.

Ops or CRM owner

CRM/export path

Decision: CSV export first, saved export preset, queued handoff job, webhook, or API sync discovery.

Proof: Use the CRM worksheet to capture fields, credentials, sample data, and failure-handling needs.

Broker admin

Access model

Decision: Who gets owner, broker admin, reviewer, team, and agent access on day one.

Proof: Named Hub accounts replace shared demo access after session login proof and client approval.

Managing broker

First success metric

Decision: Registrations captured, routed leads, follow-up speed, agent accountability, or reporting clarity.

Proof: Tie the first launch to one metric that can be reviewed in the Broker Dashboard.

Decision owner

Approval timing

Decision: Scope review date, milestone approval, launch target, and post-launch check-in.

Proof: The proposal should close with the exact next meeting and what must be provided before build setup.

Send-ready output

What should exist before the follow-up email goes out.

01 Recommended package

One selected track with initial build range, included modules, and monthly support tier.

02 First launch inputs

Community story, roster, listing links, routing rules, CRM/export needs, access roles, and timeline.

03 Proposal send packet

Proposal Builder summary, print/PDF view, follow-up email, and decision-owner ask.

04 Launch readiness path

Client-safe guide, First Launch Plan, CRM worksheet, and protected Hub screen-share plan.

Common decision points

Keep the close practical.

Do we have to replace our CRM?

No. The first launch can use broker dashboard plus CSV/export. API or webhook sync can come later once fields, credentials, and failure handling are clear.

Do we need IDX on day one?

No. Start curated: listing links, community story, and high-quality calls to action. IDX/MLS can be scoped later if it materially improves the workflow.

Will agents actually use it?

The first agent rollout should be small and focused: their own leads, tasks, profile, and featured links, without exposing global brokerage settings.

How do we avoid another one-off website?

AIRES is structured as a reusable client layer: branding, modules, feature flags, agents, routing, support package, and roadmap live as repeatable operating controls.

Recommended next move

Send one clear follow-up: track, inputs, proposal review.

The post-demo follow-up should name the recommended track, ask for the launch inputs, and schedule the proposal review. That keeps AIRES positioned as a system they can approve, not a neat demo they might revisit later.